Page 74 - Zmist-n4-2015
P. 74

y, the former showing uniform deformation, and the latter  – general plasticity under
                                                       p
                  fracture, revealed opposite tendencies with e accum increment.
                      On the basis of the principle of volume constancy of a metal during its plastic
                  deformation, it is possible to calculate its RA at the moment of reaching the σ UTS value,
                  y u, using well-known relation [12]:
                                                         1
                                                 e = 2ln    .                            (1)
                                                       1- y
                      Since e u used for calculation corresponds to the start of a neck formation because
                  of the crack nucleation inside a specimen, the obtained value y u could be considered as
                  an indirect indicator of steel resistance to crack initiation under tension. Values calcu-
                  lated for the tests in air are plotted in Fig. 2 as curve 2. Thus, these data actually repre-
                  sent  the  material  resistance  to  crack  initiation  which  is  relatively  low  for  the  tested
                  steel.
                      Likewise the subtraction y – y u could characterise the stage of crack propagation
                  – the greater this value, the higher the plasticity margin of material. Thereby y u and
                  (y – y u) could be indicators of steel resistance  to crack initiation and crack growth
                  correspondingly. Analysis of Fig. 2 (curves 1 and 2) reveals an opposite trend in the
                  changes of these values. Regularities at the stage of crack initiation correspond to the
                  expected results (e u decreases with cold drawing), while a positive effect of the steel
                  treatment on crack growth resistance could be found in the peculiarities of metal struc-
                  ture changes due to cold drawing.





















                                                    Fig. 1.                                                                      Fig. 2.
                        Fig. 1. Stress-strain curves of steel E in air (0–6) and under hydrogenation (0’–6’).
                                 The numbers indicate the cold drawing steps of the steel.
                      Fig. 2. Plasticity of the tested steel in air (1, 2) and under cathodic polarization (3, 4):
                                    1, 3 – experimentally obtained reduction in area;
                                   2, 4 – uniform reduction in area calculated from (1).

                      The foregoing approach to the plasticity parameters analysis was used also for the
                  test results of hydrogenated specimens. In contrast to the test in air, stably low values
                                    H
                  of reduction in area y  were obtained under hydrogenation conditions (Fig. 2, curve 3),
                  revealing  high  sensitivity  of  the  tested  steel  to  hydrogen  embrittlement,  previously
                  described  in  [7].  Such  behaviour  was  explained  by  progressive  pearlite  lamellas  re-
                  orientation  in  a  direction  parallel  to  the  longitudinal  wire  axis  at  each  step  of  cold
                  drawing [8]. The maximum plasticity (in terms of y) corresponds to the total re-orien-
                                                                                          73
   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79